WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

Heat Pump Clothes Dryer, Commercial

Commercial Clothes Dryer: Heat Pump vs. Electric Resistant

Commercial clothes dryer that employs heat pump technology.

Synopsis:

Heat pumps are highly valued both for their flexibility and their energy efficiency. Heat pump clothes dryers (HPCDs) are now in the early stages of deployment in the United States. Drying clothes is a growing source of electric consumption in the U.S., accounting for an estimated 6% of all residential electricity use. HPCDs require more time to dry a load of clothing than traditional dryers, but use 50% to 60% less energy. An additional benefit of HPCDs is their lower instantaneous power demand.

HPCDs have met with great success in Europe. In 2011, 47% of all dryers sold in Switzerland were HPCD, and 2012 regulations require that only HPCDs be sold in Switzerland. HPCDs are listed on the popular European "Topten" website, making it easy for consumers to find and compare models. In contrast, HPCDs have very poor availability within the U.S. ENERGY STAR is in the process of releasing the first list of ENERGY STAR-qualified HPCD models, which is expected to increase consumer acceptance and availability of this technology within the U.S.

A 2010 ACEEE study estimated that only 6% of all U.S. households run their clothes dryers often enough to see a cost benefit from a HPCD. The study noted that this estimate is sensitive to both the price of electricity and the first cost of the HPCD. The higher electricity costs in Europe may partly account for the enthusiasm of European customers for these more expensive – but more energy efficient – HPCDs.

The California Energy Commission conducted a market assessment of commercial clothes dryers within their state.  They surveyed three distinct sectors: multi-family, coin-operated laundromats, and on-premise dryers used in hotels, motels, hospitals and various institutions.  The number of 18 lb. capacity and 30 lb. capacity dryer units is estimated at 371,000.  Prorating by population for the Northwest (4% of U.S. population versus 11.75%) indicates a Northwest dryer population of 0.34 x 371,000 units or 126,000 commercial dryers (Zhang, 2011).  

Energy Savings: 50%
Energy Savings Rating: Limited Assessment  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.

Status:

Details

Heat Pump Clothes Dryer, Commercial

Commercial Clothes Dryer: Heat Pump vs. Electric Resistant

Commercial clothes dryer that employs heat pump technology.
Item ID: 438
Sector: Commercial
Energy System: Process Loads & Appliances--Commercial and Residential Appliances
Technical Advisory Group: 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
Average TAG Rating: 2.47 out of 5
TAG Ranking Date: 03/17/2014
TAG Rating Commentary:
  1. The technology needs to make more progress increasing drying speed without sacrificing efficiency and clothing wear, but is very promising.
  2. Questions on actual savings potential and cost effectiveness due to hours of operation.
  3. Cost-effectiveness not proven; high time to dry clothes may discourage adoption; moisture-sensor and controls offer better potential savings.

Synopsis:

Heat pumps are highly valued both for their flexibility and their energy efficiency. Heat pump clothes dryers (HPCDs) are now in the early stages of deployment in the United States. Drying clothes is a growing source of electric consumption in the U.S., accounting for an estimated 6% of all residential electricity use. HPCDs require more time to dry a load of clothing than traditional dryers, but use 50% to 60% less energy. An additional benefit of HPCDs is their lower instantaneous power demand.

HPCDs have met with great success in Europe. In 2011, 47% of all dryers sold in Switzerland were HPCD, and 2012 regulations require that only HPCDs be sold in Switzerland. HPCDs are listed on the popular European "Topten" website, making it easy for consumers to find and compare models. In contrast, HPCDs have very poor availability within the U.S. ENERGY STAR is in the process of releasing the first list of ENERGY STAR-qualified HPCD models, which is expected to increase consumer acceptance and availability of this technology within the U.S.

A 2010 ACEEE study estimated that only 6% of all U.S. households run their clothes dryers often enough to see a cost benefit from a HPCD. The study noted that this estimate is sensitive to both the price of electricity and the first cost of the HPCD. The higher electricity costs in Europe may partly account for the enthusiasm of European customers for these more expensive – but more energy efficient – HPCDs.

The California Energy Commission conducted a market assessment of commercial clothes dryers within their state.  They surveyed three distinct sectors: multi-family, coin-operated laundromats, and on-premise dryers used in hotels, motels, hospitals and various institutions.  The number of 18 lb. capacity and 30 lb. capacity dryer units is estimated at 371,000.  Prorating by population for the Northwest (4% of U.S. population versus 11.75%) indicates a Northwest dryer population of 0.34 x 371,000 units or 126,000 commercial dryers (Zhang, 2011).  

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: Electric Commercial Clothes Dryer
Baseline Energy Use: 3792 kWh per year per unit

Comments:

The California Energy Commission study of commercial clothes dryers notes that 18-lb. capacity dryers use either electricity or natural gas for heating while the larger 30-lb. dryers tend to almost exclusively use natural gas for heating.  There are about 260,000 18-lb. capacity dryers in California, leading to an estimate of 0.34 x 260,000 such dryers or 88,400 commercial dryers in the Northwest.  The California 18-lb. capacity dryers used about 142 GWh (142 million kWh) and 36 million therms per year of natural gas.  Converting the gas therms to electrical energy equivalent yields about 844 million kWh/year when an 80% combustion efficiency is assumed.  Disregarding the electrical energy used to rotate the drum, it is estimated that less than 14.4% of such dryers use electrical energy for heating.  The annual energy use for each commercial electric dryer must be less than 3,792 kWh/dryer/year (Zhang, 2011).

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims:

"Typical" Savings: 55%
Savings Range: From 50% to 60%

Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 50%
Energy Savings Reliability: 3 - Limited Assessment

Comments:

Savings based on analysis done by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL): http://aceee.org/files/proceedings/2010/data/papers/2224.pdf .

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
1,896 kWh per unit per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Technical Potential:
Units: unit
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 89,935
Comments:

The estimate of dryers in the Northwest per 1000 square feet is given in the 2007 Commercial Building Stock Assessment (NEEA, 2009 App C, Tables C-EQ17 and C-EQ18). The numbers for total square footage for each building type are taken from preliminary updated numbers from the 2013 update to the Commercial Building Stock Assessment (CBSA) using the estimates for 2014 (before the update was completed -- from early January, 2014). (NEEA, 2014)

        Number of Commercial Dryers

 Building Type   Total Floor space   Dryers per 1000 sf   # Dryers   % Electric   # Electric Dryers 
 Dry Goods Retail              568,000,000                        0.05                     28,400    77.6%                   22,038
 Office              278,000,000                        0.02                       5,560    87.0%                     4,837
 Hospital                75,000,000                        0.03                       2,250    45.0%                     1,013
 Hotel/Motel              188,000,000                        0.07                     13,160    27.6%                     3,632
 Other Health              162,000,000                        0.10                     16,200    56.5%                     9,153
 Other              424,000,000                        0.15                     63,600    37.6%                   23,914
 School              251,000,000                        0.02                       5,020    85.4%                     4,287
 University              128,000,000                        0.19                     24,320    86.6%                   21,061
Total                   89,935
Regional Technical Potential:
0.17 TWh per year
19 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost: Currently no data available.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): N/A

Simple payback, retrofit (years): N/A

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Reference and Citations:

Energy Star, 2013. 2013 Emerging Technology Award: Advanced Clothes Dryers
Energy Star

Steve Meyers, 07/26/2010. Do Heat Pump Clothes Dryers Make Sense for the U.S. Market?
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Martin Holladay, 05/06/2011. Alternatives to Clothes Dryers
GreenBuildingAdvisor.com

Ted Shoemaker, 05/01/2012. New and Notable: Pump Up The Heat
Home Energy Magazine

EPA, 09/13/2011. Letter from EPA to clothes dryer manufacturer or other stakeholders announcing Energy Star Emerging Technology 2012 Award categories
Environmental Protection Agency

Energy Star, 09/13/2011. Heat Pump Clothes Dryers ENERGY STAR Emerging Technology Requirements: Draft 1 Version 1.0
Energy Star

Chris Badger, 09/26/2012. Bringing North American Clothes Dryers into the 21st Century: A Case Study in Moving Markets
2012 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings

Energy Star, 08/03/2010. 2011 ENERGY STAR Emerging Technology Award Fact Sheet
Energy Star

CLASP, 11/10/2011. Super Efficient Dryer Initiative
Energy Star

CLASP, 10/01/2012. Clothes Dryer Laboratory Testing: Project Summary
Energy Star

Topten International Group, 2013. Topten International
topten.info

NEEA, 01/01/2014. Total Pacific Northwest Building Stock Based on Preliminary Numbers from the 2013 Update to the CBSA
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

CADMUS, 12/21/2009. Northwest Commercial Building Stock Assessment (CBSA): Final Report
Prepared by the CADMUS Group for the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

Miele, 11/16/2012. Miele Introduces First Heat Pump Dryer to US Market
Miele, Inc.
Special Notes: Introduction of the first commercially-available commercial laundry dryer available in the US market.

Yanda Zhang, 11/30/2011. Proposal Information Template for Commercial Clothes Dryers
Pacific Gas & Electric, San Diego Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison, and Southern California Gas Company

Rank & Scores

Heat Pump Clothes Dryer, Commercial

2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)


Technical Advisory Group: 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
TAG Ranking: 29 out of 44 Technologies (2014 Commercial TAG strategies ranked separately)
Average TAG Rating: 2.47 out of 5
TAG Ranking Date: 03/17/2014
TAG Rating Commentary:

  1. The technology needs to make more progress increasing drying speed without sacrificing efficiency and clothing wear, but is very promising.
  2. Questions on actual savings potential and cost effectiveness due to hours of operation.
  3. Cost-effectiveness not proven; high time to dry clothes may discourage adoption; moisture-sensor and controls offer better potential savings.


Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo