WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

Install Ducts in Conditioned Space

Ducts: Conditioned Space vs. Unconditioned Space

Designing buildings with ducts in conditioned space to eliminate the heat loss associated with duct leakage.

Synopsis:

In most cases, heating and cooling ducts are located outside the thermal and pressure boundary of the conditioned space. A wide body of literature has found that distribution system conduction and air leakage can cause 30-40% energy losses before cooling and heating air reaches the conditioned space.

This strategy is typically impractical as a retrofit application because ductwork can be difficult to access and expensive to retrofit.  Since even well-sealed and insulated ducts will leak conditioned air, many new energy-efficient homes now place the duct system within the conditioned space of the home. Not only does this ensure that leaked air is entering the conditioned space, but it also reduces the temperature gradient between the conditioned air travelling through the duct and its environment. This reduction in temperature gradient reduces the loss of energy via conduction through the duct’s insulated sleeve.

Duct air leakage has also been implicated in indoor air quality problems, including backdrafting of combustion appliances, causing vehicle exhaust to enter the living space, and transporting pollutants (including moisture) from unconditioned to conditioned spaces.

This strategy may be accomplished in part by air sealing and insulating the attic space and adding additional fresh-air supply, and by placing ducts in chases. Although this strategy will result in greater surface area to the outside for heat transfer and a bigger volume of air to condition, these relatively small increases in energy use are offset by the benefits of capturing duct losses.

Energy Savings: 10%
Energy Savings Rating: Extensive Assessment  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.
Simple Payback, New Construction (years): 19.4   What's this?
Simple Payback, Retrofit (years): 20.0   What's this?

Simple Payback is one tool used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a proposed investment, such as the investment in an energy efficient technology. Simple payback indicates how many years it will take for the initial investment to "pay itself back." The basic formula for calculating a simple payback is:

Simple Payback = Incremental First Cost / Annual Savings

The Incremental Cost is determined by subtracting the Baseline First Cost from the Measure First Cost.

For New Construction, the Baseline First Cost is the cost to purchase the standard practice technology. The Measure First Cost is the cost of the alternative, more energy efficienct technology. Installation costs are not included, as it is assumed that installation costs are approximately the same for the Baseline and the Emerging Technology.

For Retrofit scenarios, the Baseline First Cost is $0, since the baseline scenario is to leave the existing equipment in place. The Emerging Technology First Cost is the Measure First Cost plus Installation Cost (the cost of the replacement technology, plus the labor cost to install it). Retrofit scenarios generally have a higher First Cost and longer Simple Paybacks than New Construction scenarios.

Simple Paybacks are called "simple" because they do not include details such as the time value of money or inflation, and often do not include operations and maintenance (O&M) costs or end-of-life disposal costs. However, they can still provide a powerful tool for a quick assessment of a proposed measure. These paybacks are rough estimates based upon best available data, and should be treated with caution. For major financial decisions, it is suggested that a full Lifecycle Cost Analysis be performed which includes the unique details of your situation.

The energy savings estimates are based upon an electric rate of $.09/kWh, and are calculated by comparing the range of estimated energy savings to the baseline energy use. For most technologies, this results in "Typical," "Fast" and "Slow" payback estimates, corresponding with the "Typical," "High" and "Low" estimates of energy savings, respectively.

Status:

Details

Install Ducts in Conditioned Space

Ducts: Conditioned Space vs. Unconditioned Space

Designing buildings with ducts in conditioned space to eliminate the heat loss associated with duct leakage.
Item ID: 154
Sector: Residential
Energy System: HVAC--Air & Fluid Distribution
Technical Advisory Group: 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
Average TAG Rating: 2.5 out of 5
TAG Ranking Date: 06/29/2010
Technical Advisory Group: 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
Technical Advisory Group: 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
Average TAG Rating: 3.67 out of 5
TAG Ranking Date: 04/10/2014
TAG Rating Commentary:
  1. Would be another great addition to a new construction program.  Low tech and would be understood and accepted by customers.

  2. I don’t know how this is an "emerging" technology.

  3. Good strategy, feels out of scope for ResTag

  4. Should be part of a package of measures for new construction. Does not apply to existing buildings, unless you are considering integration with weatherization programs.

  5. This is a building practice, not an emerging technology.  We had a measure for this already and nothing happened with it.  Needs marketing support.

  6. I understand that this is already in current Washington State building code.  I haven't heard of any significant pushback.

Synopsis:

In most cases, heating and cooling ducts are located outside the thermal and pressure boundary of the conditioned space. A wide body of literature has found that distribution system conduction and air leakage can cause 30-40% energy losses before cooling and heating air reaches the conditioned space.

This strategy is typically impractical as a retrofit application because ductwork can be difficult to access and expensive to retrofit.  Since even well-sealed and insulated ducts will leak conditioned air, many new energy-efficient homes now place the duct system within the conditioned space of the home. Not only does this ensure that leaked air is entering the conditioned space, but it also reduces the temperature gradient between the conditioned air travelling through the duct and its environment. This reduction in temperature gradient reduces the loss of energy via conduction through the duct’s insulated sleeve.

Duct air leakage has also been implicated in indoor air quality problems, including backdrafting of combustion appliances, causing vehicle exhaust to enter the living space, and transporting pollutants (including moisture) from unconditioned to conditioned spaces.

This strategy may be accomplished in part by air sealing and insulating the attic space and adding additional fresh-air supply, and by placing ducts in chases. Although this strategy will result in greater surface area to the outside for heat transfer and a bigger volume of air to condition, these relatively small increases in energy use are offset by the benefits of capturing duct losses.

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: New homes with electric heat pumps (assume all ductwork located outside of the insulated building envelope
Baseline Energy Use: 2 kWh per year per square foot

Comments:

The 2011 Residential Building Stock Assessment (David Baylon, 2012-09-18) is used to estimate heating energy use in electrically heated homes to be 4.0 kWh/sf-yr (see ET#300). This strategy applies to new construction only and homes with electric heat would likely be using more efficient heat pump technology rather than baseboard or electric forced air furnaces. The Residential Building Stock Assessment Metering Study ( Ecotope, 04/28/2014) estimates heating energy use for existing homes with electric heat pumps to be 3.1 kWh/sf-yr. Because new homes will be more efficient due to current building codes, assume that new electrically heated homes will use approximately two-thirds this amount or 2 kWh/sf-yr.

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims:

Comments:

This is a strategy so there is no manufacturer

Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 10%
Low and High Energy Savings: 5% to 35%
Energy Savings Reliability: 4 - Extensive Assessment

Comments:

There are many sources that discuss losses in ductwork.  The sources vary widely, from 10% to 35%.  The losses are due to leakage and to conduction.  Due to code mandates to seal all joints with a mastic that holds up over time (better than duct tape), this ET conservatively attributes about 10% energy loss in ductwork that is located outside the thermal envelope.  The US DOE Building Technologies Office estimates a 15% national average unit energy savings due to installing ducts in conditioned space (Navigant Consulting, 2012). 

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
1.8 kWh per square foot per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Technical Potential:
Units: square foot
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 232,650,000
Comments:

This strategy applies to new construction for electrically heated single family homes. RBSA data (Ecotope, Inc., 2014) includes projections of residential building square footage that show an annual growth rate of approximately 1%. If we assume approximately 1% of the existing housing stock is replaced by new construction or major renovation (~100 year life), then new construction is 2% of existing housing stock. Assuming the next 10 years of construction represents the potential market results in 22% of existing single family square footage = 0.22 * 4,230,000,000 = 930,600,000 sf. In existing homes from the RBSA, 34% of homes have electric heat. I new construction, natural gas has tended to represent a larger share. However the increasing efficiency of heat pumps and the desire for air condition make this an attractive option. Assume the long-term share for forced air heat pumps is 25%, so the potential is 930,600,000 * 0.25 = 232,650,000.

Regional Technical Potential:
0.05 TWh per year
5 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost:

Installed first cost per: square foot
Emerging Technology Unit Cost (Equipment Only): $0.35
Emerging Technology Installation Cost (Labor, Disposal, Etc.): $0.01
Baseline Technology Unit Cost (Equipment Only): $0.00

Comments:

Any additional incremental costs are estimated to be minimal ((Lubliner, 2008). The cost will be in changing design and construction practices to incorporate this strategy.  The California Energy Commission estimates the incremental cost to install ducts in conditioned space is $700 with costs ranging from $0 to $4000 (Navigant Consulting, 2012).  With an average house comprising about 2006 square feet in the Northwest, incremental installation costs are estimated at $0.35/sf.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): 19.4

Simple payback, retrofit (years): 20.0

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Reference and Citations:

David Baylon, et. al., 09/18/2012. 2011 Residential Building Stock Assessment: Single-Family Characteristics and Energy Use
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance & Ecotope

Michael Lubliner, 07/31/2008. Moving Ducts Inside: Big Builders, Scientists Find Common Ground
ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings

D. Beal, 11/23/2011. Measure Guideline: Summary of Interior Ducts in New Construction, Including an Efficient, Affordable Method to Install Fur-Down Interior Ducts
National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Jeffrey Siegel, 08/18/2003. Integrating Ducts Into the Conditioned Space: Successes and Challenges
University of Texas

U.S. D.O.E., 10/01/2013. Designing and Installing New Duct Systems
Energy Savers

PATH, 07/04/2006. Ducts in Conditioned Space: Insulating the Attic Roofline for Comfort & Energy Savings
Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing

Ecotope, 04/28/2014. Residential Building Stock Assessment: Metering Study
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

xx, 09/01/2015. xx
xx
Special Notes: Obtained from Massoud

Navigant Consulting, 10/01/2012. Energy Savings and RD&D Opportunities for Residential Building HVAC Systems
U.S. DOE Building Technologies Office

Rank & Scores

Install Ducts in Conditioned Space

2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)


Technical Advisory Group: 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating: 3.67 out of 5
TAG Ranking Date: 04/10/2014
TAG Rating Commentary:

  1. Would be another great addition to a new construction program.  Low tech and would be understood and accepted by customers.

  2. I don’t know how this is an "emerging" technology.

  3. Good strategy, feels out of scope for ResTag

  4. Should be part of a package of measures for new construction. Does not apply to existing buildings, unless you are considering integration with weatherization programs.

  5. This is a building practice, not an emerging technology.  We had a measure for this already and nothing happened with it.  Needs marketing support.

  6. I understand that this is already in current Washington State building code.  I haven't heard of any significant pushback.



2010 HVAC TAG (#3)


Technical Advisory Group: 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
TAG Ranking: 25 out of 36
Average TAG Rating: 2.5 out of 5
TAG Ranking Date: 06/29/2010
TAG Rating Commentary:

2009 HVAC TAG (#2)


Technical Advisory Group: 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo