WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

Integrated Design Strategies

Building Design: Integrated Design Strategies vs. Independent Energy Systems

Design a strategy that considers interaction and synergy among energy systems in order to maximize building energy efficiency and cost effectiveness, such as building envelope improvements that decrease the cost of HVAC and PV systems.

Synopsis:

Designing a building holistically is a valuable method for saving energy in buildings.  In addition to creating a building that is accessible, cost effective, flexible, safe, etc, energy consumption and sustainability is something in which each member of the design, construction, and maintenance team has an impact.

For example, the choice of a mechanical system might impact the quality of the air in the building, the ease of maintenance, global climate change, operating costs, fuel choice, and whether the windows of a building are operable. In turn, the size of the mechanical system will depend on factors such as, the type of lighting and controls used, how much natural daylight is brought in, how the space is organized, the facility's operating hours, and the local microclimate. At the same time, these same materials and systems choices may have an impact on the aesthetics, accessibility, and security of the project. And for buildings intended to achieve zero net energy status, any reductions in energy use can translate to big savings in cost reductions of the photovoltaic (PV) array.

This proposal calls for encouraging architects to follow a design and construction protocol---such as the ASHRAE "Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small to Medium Office Buildings: Achieving 50% Energy Savings Toward a Net Zero Energy Building"---that includes energy and sustainability in the highest priority.  Part of this protocol can be a computer simulation of the building that accounts for energy consumption and sustainability, as well as ease of maintenance and longevity.

Energy Savings: 5%
Energy Savings Rating: Extensive Assessment  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.

Status:

Details

Integrated Design Strategies

Building Design: Integrated Design Strategies vs. Independent Energy Systems

Design a strategy that considers interaction and synergy among energy systems in order to maximize building energy efficiency and cost effectiveness, such as building envelope improvements that decrease the cost of HVAC and PV systems.
Item ID: 196
Sector: Residential, Commercial, Industrial
Energy System: Multiple Energy Systems--Design
Technical Advisory Group: 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
Technical Advisory Group: 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
Average TAG Rating: 3.81 out of 5
TAG Ranking Date: 03/17/2014
TAG Rating Commentary:
  1. Promising but not detailed enough to assess accurately

Synopsis:

Designing a building holistically is a valuable method for saving energy in buildings.  In addition to creating a building that is accessible, cost effective, flexible, safe, etc, energy consumption and sustainability is something in which each member of the design, construction, and maintenance team has an impact.

For example, the choice of a mechanical system might impact the quality of the air in the building, the ease of maintenance, global climate change, operating costs, fuel choice, and whether the windows of a building are operable. In turn, the size of the mechanical system will depend on factors such as, the type of lighting and controls used, how much natural daylight is brought in, how the space is organized, the facility's operating hours, and the local microclimate. At the same time, these same materials and systems choices may have an impact on the aesthetics, accessibility, and security of the project. And for buildings intended to achieve zero net energy status, any reductions in energy use can translate to big savings in cost reductions of the photovoltaic (PV) array.

This proposal calls for encouraging architects to follow a design and construction protocol---such as the ASHRAE "Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small to Medium Office Buildings: Achieving 50% Energy Savings Toward a Net Zero Energy Building"---that includes energy and sustainability in the highest priority.  Part of this protocol can be a computer simulation of the building that accounts for energy consumption and sustainability, as well as ease of maintenance and longevity.

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: Deep retrofit of conventional design and construction building
Baseline Energy Use: 16.7 kWh per year per square foot

Comments:

Taken from 2007 CBSA (NEEA, 2009 Pg 38). Used overall average of all commercial buildings, since any of them can use integrated design in a deep retrofit.

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims:

"Typical" Savings: 50%
Savings Range: From 30% to 80%

Comments:

The ASHRAE "Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small to Medium Office Buildings: Achieving 50% Energy Savings Toward a Net Zero Energy Building" illustrates how the Integrated Design Process can be used to achieve energy savings that are at or below 50% of the current code requirements.  The integrated process contains strategies and technology recommendations that address natural ventilation for cooling, HVAC free cooling, daylighting, nighttime heat purge, heat recovery, and selection of building materials, high performance window glazing, use of thermal mass, limiting east and west window area, optimal orientation of skylights and clerestories, measures to reduce infiltration and many more.  The integrated approach focuses on the envelope, lighting (and exterior lighting), plug loads, HVAC systems, and service water heating to understand the relative design influence of EUI. 

Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 5%
Energy Savings Reliability: 4 - Extensive Assessment

Comments:

Wide range of possibility, depending on how effective the integration and the team is. Compared to standard business as usual construction, savings can be as high as 80-90%, so the 50% savings for the advanced energy design guide is fairly conservative. Compared with conventional methods of deep retrofit, we assume integrated design strategies will result in an additional 5% savings. These assumptions need secondary research.  There is also a difference in what can be achieved with new construction or a major remodel, versus a more simple building improvement.  Savings are also dependent upon baseline energy code requirements, which are always becoming more stringent.

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
15.9 kWh per square foot per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Technical Potential:
Units: square foot
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 2,640,946,000
Comments:

This technology could technically be used for virtually any commercial building, when doing a deep retrofit, so we are using the total of the entire commercial building stock in the Northwest. The numbers are taken from preliminary updated numbers from the 2013 update to the Commercial Building Stock Assessment (CBSA) using the estimates for 2014 (before the update was completed -- from early January, 2014) multiplied times the percentage of commercial space that is conditioned based on the 2009 CBSA.

 Total Commercial Floor space   % Conditioned   Conditioned space 
 Source, units   (NEEA, 2014) (s.f.)  (NEEA, 2009 App C)            (s.f.)
         3,118,000,000        84.7%       2,640,946,000
Regional Technical Potential:
2.21 TWh per year
252 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost: Currently no data available.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): N/A

Simple payback, retrofit (years): N/A

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Reference and Citations:

NEEA, 01/01/2014. Total Pacific Northwest Building Stock Based on Preliminary Numbers from the 2013 Update to the CBSA
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

CADMUS, 12/21/2009. Northwest Commercial Building Stock Assessment (CBSA): Final Report
Prepared by the CADMUS Group for the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

Kent Peterson, 08/22/2012. Integrated Building Design: Bringing the Pieces Together to Unleash the Power of Teamwork
ASHRAE

Don Prowler, 03/22/2012. Whole Building Design
Donald Prowler & Associates

WBDG, 11/05/2012. Engage the Integrated Design Process
WBDG Aesthetics Subcommittee

WBDG, 08/01/2013. Ensure Appropriate Product/Systems Integration
WBDG Functional / Operational Committee

NREL, 11/18/2013. Electricity Integration Research
National Renewable Energy Laboratory

NREL, 01/21/2014. Electric Infrastructure Systems Technology Analysis
National Renewable Energy Laboratory

PNNL, 07/01/2011. Sensors & Electronics
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

EPA, 04/06/2012. Energy Efficiency: Integrated Design and HVAC Systems
Environmental Protection Agency

Marija Trcka, 06/21/2010. Co-simulation of innovative integrated HVAC systems in buildings
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Rank & Scores

Integrated Design Strategies

2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)


Technical Advisory Group: 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
TAG Ranking: 1 out of 21 Strategies (2014 Commercial TAG technologies ranked separately)
Average TAG Rating: 3.81 out of 5
TAG Ranking Date: 03/17/2014
TAG Rating Commentary:

  1. Promising but not detailed enough to assess accurately


2009 HVAC TAG (#2)


Technical Advisory Group: 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo