WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

Lighting Controls for Outdoor Lighting

Outdoor Lighting: Advanced controls vs. Photosensors

Advanced control systems with dimmable sources to adjust the amount of light for the presence of people, time of day, season and weather conditions and significantly reduce energy use.

Synopsis:

Controlling outdoor lighting to deliver the right amount of light in the right place at the appropriate time can reduce energy use by as much as 60%. Alternatives to dusk-to-dawn photocell controls or time clocks are available to work with compatible lighting systems.

Good lighting invites people into places. Light that is dimmed when spaces are unoccupied but comes up to full power when occupancy is detected may be preferable to no light, especially on paths where people travel. Potential applications of advanced controls include most kinds of outdoor lighting such as parking lots, campuses, courtyards, parks, pathways, street lighting, and building mounted lighting. LEDs are especially suitable for application of advanced controls but new fixtures are generally required. Lighting levels may be varied from 100% to 10% when controls respond to occupancy, time of day (or night) and photocell sensors.

Wireless mesh networks make it possible to control lights over a large area. Each fixture or group of fixtures may be individually controllable, and a remote computer or smart device can be used to program the controls. New integrated sensors and controls may also be “smart,” allowing fixtures to act independently. Some systems can communicate with – and control – other systems. Two-way communication can be used to report trouble, which substantially reduces labor expenses. Energy use can be directly monitored and controlled. Very advanced systems may include emergency management functions, police control for crime scene management and surveillance systems. This is a rapidly evolving field and interconnectivity of components is not standardized. It is crucial to obtain current information when planning a project.

Energy Savings: 40%
Energy Savings Rating: Approved Measure  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.
TAG Technical Score:  2.98

Status:

Details

Lighting Controls for Outdoor Lighting

Outdoor Lighting: Advanced controls vs. Photosensors

Advanced control systems with dimmable sources to adjust the amount of light for the presence of people, time of day, season and weather conditions and significantly reduce energy use.
Item ID: 225
Sector: Commercial
Energy System: Lighting--Sensors & Controls
Technical Advisory Group: 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
Technical Advisory Group: 2013 Advanced Lighting Controls Systems TAG (#7)

Synopsis:

Controlling outdoor lighting to deliver the right amount of light in the right place at the appropriate time can reduce energy use by as much as 60%. Alternatives to dusk-to-dawn photocell controls or time clocks are available to work with compatible lighting systems.

Good lighting invites people into places. Light that is dimmed when spaces are unoccupied but comes up to full power when occupancy is detected may be preferable to no light, especially on paths where people travel. Potential applications of advanced controls include most kinds of outdoor lighting such as parking lots, campuses, courtyards, parks, pathways, street lighting, and building mounted lighting. LEDs are especially suitable for application of advanced controls but new fixtures are generally required. Lighting levels may be varied from 100% to 10% when controls respond to occupancy, time of day (or night) and photocell sensors.

Wireless mesh networks make it possible to control lights over a large area. Each fixture or group of fixtures may be individually controllable, and a remote computer or smart device can be used to program the controls. New integrated sensors and controls may also be “smart,” allowing fixtures to act independently. Some systems can communicate with – and control – other systems. Two-way communication can be used to report trouble, which substantially reduces labor expenses. Energy use can be directly monitored and controlled. Very advanced systems may include emergency management functions, police control for crime scene management and surveillance systems. This is a rapidly evolving field and interconnectivity of components is not standardized. It is crucial to obtain current information when planning a project.

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: 27W LED lamp
Baseline Energy Use: 118 kWh per year per unit

Comments:

Based on the assumption of installing controls and converting to LED technology. This energy use analysis assumes the use of a 27W LED replacement for an original 70W HPS lamp (http://www.alibaba.com/showroom/27w-replace-70w-hps-outdoor-high-power-led-solar.html), operating for 12 hours per day.

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims:

"Typical" Savings: 60%

Comments:

The California Lighting Technology Center (CLTC) has achieved 60% energy savings (1 million kWh) over a static system with the networked adaptive lighting system on the UC Davis campus. Parking lots at a group of shopping centers are achieving approximately the same savings by dimming the lights after the stores close to two reduced levels using new LED fixtures that replaced metal halide high intensity discharge lamps. The exact amount of energy savings will depend on previous technology and operations compared to new ones.

Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 40%
Energy Savings Reliability: 6 - Approved Measure

Comments:

There is a lot of variation in savings, depending on baseline and how the lights are being controlled. Forty percent is thought to be fairly conservative, and would be typical for a situation with moderate traffic and a low lamp setting that requires 50% of maximum input power.  Higher savings are achieved with lower traffic flow or when a lower setting is selected for unoccupied periods (especially if the lights are turned off without occupancy). This technology is already in the BPA Lighting Calculator, so the Energy Savings Reliability is rated as 6 – Approved Measure.

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
70.8 kWh per unit per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Technical Potential:
Units: unit
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 5,780,000
Comments:

Based on outdoor lighting estimates in the 2010 U.S. Lighting Market Characterization, Navigant for U.S. DOE, 2012, Table 4-1: “Estimated Inventory of Lamps in the U.S. by End-Use Sector in 2010”.  The study estimates a nationwide installed inventory of 93,087,000 outdoor high intensity discharge lamps in the U.S. with an additional 22,275,000 LED lamps, and 29,124,000 linear fluorescent lamps.  Halogen and compact fluorescent lamps will not be considered due to their presumed lower wattages.  Prorating by the Northwest portion of the U.S. population indicates a retrofit potential of: 0.04 x (144,486,000 lamps) = 5,779,440 total lamps 

Regional Technical Potential:
0.27 TWh per year
31 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost:

Installed first cost per: unit

Comments:

Costs will vary depending on:

  • Which technologies are implemented,
  • If parts of the existing system are retrofitted or if it is all replaced,
  • The scope of the system, and
  • Training for operators.


A traditional photocell costs about $75 to $100. A wireless mesh system costs around $250 per fixture, but prices will vary depending on many factors. Fixtures with integrated controls and sensors cost more but reduce field labor and possibly rental time of lift equipment.  New construction costs are $150 per unit.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): N/A

Simple payback, retrofit (years): N/A

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Comments:

Costs will vary widely depending on many factors, including the incumbent technology, the new technology and features selected, the cost of energy, the value of non-energy benefits, and any incentives to reduce the cost. Several large projects are finding payback in the range of two to four years, but other payback periods could be much larger. All estimates will be subject to change as product costs come down and/or electricity rates increase.

Detailed Description:

The ability to turn lights off automatically when they are not needed is a proven energy saver, whether it is a single porch light or a campus-wide area. The basic requirements for an automated lighting system include:   

  • Sensors that accurately measure the need for lighting (based on daylight, occupancy and time of day).
  • A control system that adjusts the lighting based on sensor input.
  • Lamps that can be turned off and on frequently in response to occupancy without negative impacts (such as greatly shortened lamp life).
  • Fixtures with integrated sensors and controls are available. In large systems, a networked control strategy can be used for all fixtures and be controlled by computer if software and appropriate communication channels with the lighting fixture are incorporated. 
       

Wireless controls are making installation easier than ever. Wireless networks can include other functions such as traffic lights, smart grid/smart city projects, and traffic data. Drawing a line between components gets fuzzy with integrated components and systems that are mostly proprietary (as of early 2013). At least one product, Illuminating Concepts from Intellistreets includes poles as part of the system and options that can assist Homeland Security or other operations with crowd control and emergency information. This system can also provide advertising space that owners can use to help pay for it. This product was named the IES lighting control Innovation of Merit Award winner in January 2013.

Product Information:
WattStopper, FSP-211 Digital High/Low Passive Infrared Fixture Integrated Outdoor Sensor GE Lighting, Lighting Controls ZigBee Alliance, Zigbee IP Intellistreets, Illuminating Concepts

Standard Practice:

Standard practice for controlling most area lights is to use dusk-to-dawn control sensors mounted on each unit. Time clocks are fairly common where there is a predictable schedule. Dimming and motion detectors have been limited in the past to use with incandescent or fluorescent lighting systems due to the slow response of HID systems unless a bi-level ballast is used. Halogen lights controlled with motion sensors are fairly common for residential entry and driveway lighting, where the area covered is relatively small. Standard wall switches are still common at entryways or loading docks at many facilities.

Development Status:

High-performance fluorescent lighting systems, electronic ballasts for HID lighting and LEDs are making more refined outdoor lighting controls possible in more applications. Fixtures with integral controls beyond just a simple photocell are now available.

The old standard – dusk-to-dawn photocells – are available in models that are on about half the night; these shut off in the early morning hours then turn them back on before dawn if activity is expected at that time. Photocells are manually programmed or have onboard controls that calculate how long the darkness should last, shut the lights off and then turn them back on at a set time before dawn.

Electronic ballasts are making dimming possible in increasingly higher wattages for HID systems that were previously limited to high/low operation in conjunction with occupancy sensors. Strike and re-strike times are still a factor in systems where the lights turn off completely.

LED fixtures can be switched frequently, illuminate instantly and are available with integral controls. Longer-lasting and more durable sensors are available and are still evolving. The latest technology on the scene is "fixture-integrated cognitive sensor/controllers."  They have sensors built into the luminaire that automatically responds to its environment – whether it's occupancy, available daylight, time of day or other variables – and deliver just the right amount of light when and where it is needed -- is the perfect solution for reducing energy consumption and costs. Rather than applying controls as an afterthought the built-in approach maximizes energy efficiency.

Mesh networks can operate multiple lights, transmit operating signals past non-functioning units and use two-way communication to report failures. Occupancy sensors are combining ultrasonic, infrared and even visual information to make their response more accurate. Units are being developed that can cover large areas from high mounting points in parking lots and other areas. Wireless technology makes retrofits and new construction installation easier, and comes as wireless infrared, radio frequency or powerline carrier systems.

The California Lighting Technology Center has installed a networked wireless adaptive outdoor lighting control system using Lumewave controls and LumeStart control software. These controls are installed on a series Philips Lumec LED outdoor lighting fixtures and wallpacks and WattStopper sensors (daylight and occupancy) to calculate the occupants' direction of travel and turn the lights on and off relative to their position – a necessary function for traffic that moves faster than a slow stroll. Lighted areas invite people in while dark areas do not, so it is essential to light areas ahead of travel.   One example of this is a bike path on the UC Davis campus.  It is illuminated at night with a “just in time” system. One light node alerts another and another down the line as a bicycle goes by, progressively lighting the rider’s way, then dimming back into an energy-saving mode. (Barringer, 2013)

Non-Energy Benefits:

Lights that burn all night when they are not actually being used by people can negatively impact animals in the area and neighboring properties, and may increase skyglow, obscuring the view of stars in the night sky, particularly for astronomical observatories within range. 

The jury is still out on whether lighting unoccupied spaces thwarts, assists or has no impact on crime in the area. Occupancy sensors could alert security staff about the location of unwanted activity by brightening or turning on when someone enters the space. Sensors that are just emerging on the market may include video surveillance and the capability to signal or provide information during emergencies.

Mesh networks can control much more than street lighting, such as enabling better traffic flow and providing damage reports and emergency information. However, this aspect of information gathering and transmission may also prompt public resistance due to concerns about invasion of privacy. Before these types of features are included in a system, obtain public buy-in.

When dimming is involved with traffic lighting, it is important to sort out concerns about liability in case accidents or other negative activities occur. If units fail, the default setting should be “full on” rather than off or dimmed. 

For systems that use mesh networks to control each fixture alone or in groups, lighting can be adjusted for special events in only the area of the event while other areas remain dimmed. For systems incorporating color-changing capabilities, lights could be colored for special events or holidays and only in areas where it is desired. 

Much of the expected savings depend on the systems having a long life (which greatly reduces maintenance costs as well), but no installations in use have yet reached that expected end of life so there are still some unknowns. 

Greenhouse gas reduction is a benefit of reducing energy use.

End User Drawbacks:

First costs are still a barrier to new control strategies for outdoor lighting because they often include entire new lighting systems. Most current installations got funded when the Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds were available, but that program has ended. Paybacks tend to run above five years – close to ten for many installations if energy savings are the only basis used to calculate payback.

It is essential to find (and pay for) qualified help to put together a system that will meet the customer's needs. The task of sorting through the proliferation of products and marketing materials and understanding the components and their interactions can be challenging.

In late 2012, most control systems were somewhat proprietary and standards for interconnectivity were still in development. In late March 2013, ZigBee announced the completion and availability of the first open standard for an IPv6-based full wireless mesh network. A draft of a model specification for adaptive control and remote monitoring is out for comment now from the Municipal Solid-State Street Lighting Consortium. Once completed, this specification will provide some assistance in specifying these controls.

Potential buyers will need to:

  • Determine when to invest in a lighting control system,    

  • Determine its value, and

  • Decide if they want the additional features that come with a proprietary system or wait for more interconnectivity and features to become standard and less expensive.

For municipal street lighting, potential buyers will need to:

  • Determine if the projected energy savings will result in monetary savings, especially in light of tariffs;

  • Decide if they should retrofit existing lighting or invest in a new system; and

  • Train staff in operation and maintenance of the system.

Operations and Maintenance Costs:

Comments:

By using LED lighting with wireless controls operated from a remote computer or (eventually) onboard the fixture, labor costs are significantly reduced and lamp replacement costs are spread out over much longer interval. By the time the systems that are installed today fail, performance is expected to have significantly improved.

Effective Life:

Comments:

Efforts are underway to ensure that all components of an outdoor lighting system and its controls have similar life expectancies and that field replaceable components are available. Most outdoor LED lighting on the market today is expected to last at least 50,000 hours.

Drivers have been a weak link in their performance, but this is changing. A move to modular, field-replaceable drivers is also happening. Drivers and controls that compensate for lumen loss over time are also available to extend the useful life of the system. In general, LEDs and their controls should last at least 15 years.

Computer software will undoubtedly be subject to periodic upgrades. Mesh networks can keep all working units operational by passing messages around failed units.

Like most electronic devices, the actual lifetime in use may be shortened by the arrival of better products on the market or catastrophic events (such as weather, traffic accidents, natural disasters or vandalism). Of course, these factors can affect any lighting system, but the window of opportunity in which they can occur is much longer with very long-lived products like the proposed technology.

Competing Technologies:

Simple adjustments to existing equipment:

  • Dusk-to-dawn photocell controls and enhanced half-night photocell controls.
  • Stepped lighting reductions used with more conventional lighting that are controlled by time clock, starting with the most distant areas and moving closer in large parking areas.       
         
Switch to new lighting:  Reducing energy use by switching to more efficient lighting.                                   
Reference and Citations:

IDA, 01/01/2000. Efficient Outdoor Lighting
International Dark-Sky Association

LEDs Magazine, 09/11/2012. Philips' Van Duinen says LED lighting will be connected to the Internet of things
LEDs Magazine

LEDs Magazine, 04/17/2012. Outdoor Lighting: Cree announces new LED street lights; ALSI enhances fixtures
LEDs Magazine

Intellistreets, 05/29/2013. Intellistreets: Sustainability, Security and Entertainment
Intellistreets

PG&E, 03/18/2009. Application Assessment of Bi-Level LED Parking Lot Lighting
Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Maury Wright, 02/01/2012. Use of controls escalates in LED lighting despite lack of standards
LEDs Magazine

SEI, 07/24/2002. Efficient Lighting Strategies: Wise design choices can meet lighting needs
Southface.org

LRC, 09/01/2010. Dynamic Outdoor Lighting
Lighting Research Center

Mark Rehley, et. al., 08/31/2011. Technology and Market Assessment of Networked Outdoor Lighting Controls
U.S. Department of Energy, Municipal Solid-State Street Lighting Consortium

CPUC, 03/23/2011. Draft Measure Information Template – Outdoor Lighting and Controls
California Utilities Statewide Codes and Standards Team

John Selander, 06/01/2011. Intelligent Lighting for Exterior Spaces
Municipal Solid State Lighting Consortium,

Desiree Hanford, 12/01/2011. Exterior Lighting Controls, Fixtures Can Reduce Energy Use and Provide Security
Facilitiesnet

DOD, 12/10/2010. Unified Facilities Criteria – Design: Interior, Exterior Lighting and Controls
Department of Defense

LCA, 01/09/2013. Intellistreets Wins IES Lighting Control Innovation Award of Merit
Lighting Controls Association

CLTC, 06/18/2012. California Lighting Technology Center Demonstrates Intelligent Outdoor Lighting Control System
UC Davis

LCA, 12/05/2012. IMS Research: Street Lighting Is Set To Become Smart
Lighting Controls Association

LCA, 01/23/2013. DOE Finds Up To 76% Energy Savings with Occupancy Sensors
Lighting Controls Association

DOE, 10/23/2013. DOE Municipal Solid-State Street Lighting Consortium
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Silvie Casanova, 12/17/2012. Philips Launches the IntelliPower Dynamic LED Lighting Solution
Business Wire

LEDs Magazine, 11/13/2012. Streetlight.Vision and Paradox Engineering team up to develop public lighting management solutions
LEDS Magazine

LEDs Magazine, 10/16/2012. Toshiba introduces new LED luminaires for street and industrial lighting
LEDs Magazine

LCA, 06/04/2012. Acuity Brands Launches ROAMview Lighting Control System
Lighting Controls Association

Maury Wright, 05/22/2013. Control technology for LEDs and other lighting remains fragmented at Lightfair
LEDs Magazine

Maury Wright, 02/01/2011. Wireless Networks Enable City-Wide Control of LED Street-Light Installations
LEDs Magazine

Maury Wright, 12/01/2012. Lighting controls dominated the discussion at the Street and Area Lighting Conference
LEDS Magazine

Felicity Barringer, 04/23/2013. New Technology Inspires a Rethinking of Light
New York Times

Rank & Scores

Lighting Controls for Outdoor Lighting

2013 Advanced Lighting Controls Systems TAG (#7)


Technical Advisory Group: 2013 Advanced Lighting Controls Systems TAG (#7)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Technical Score Details

TAG Technical Score: 3.0 out of 5

How significant and reliable are the energy savings?
Energy Savings Score: 3.5 Comments:

1.      With most exterior lighting ondusk-to-dawn every day of the year, with little occupancy or need for fulllight output, there is large energy savings potential. In addition to thesavings from controls, new dimmable sources, such as LEDs, can be more efficientthan existing HID sources. The savings is excellent for reliable controls. Forbehavior-based controls, such as occupancy, the savings will vary amongapplications. For SCE, exterior lighting is on during off-peak hours, so theenergy savings is not as valuable as the energy savings from applications thatare on-peak (around noon to early evening during the hottest days of the yearwhen air conditioning is the primary load on our electrical system).

2.      These controls systems when combinedwith LED technology can have substantial energy savings without losingperformance in the space.

3.      Highly variable, if streetlightingdimming may not be allowed. In private parking lots, etc. savings could besubstantial if currently illuminated all night every night and could switch tostep dimming or period of off.

4.      Very application specific but cangenerate good savings.   Savings can befairly reliable/predicable because usage patterns are likely more predicablethat interior applications.

5.      Save by dimming, shorter hours; andusing to tune so that areas are not overlit to begin with

6.      This technology holds greatpotential as these lights are generally on for long periods of time and are notgenerally controlled beyond Time clocks and photocells.

How great are the non-energy advantages for adopting this technology?
Non-Energy Benefits Score: 3.4
Comments:

1.      The non-energy benefits are 5-VeryGood. For exterior area and street lighting, safety and security is veryimportant. Some systems provide energy and usage information on exteriorfixture performance. Dimming LED products also enables longer life to reducemaintenance costs.

2.      The controllability of the LEDfixture allows for greater control of light levels to insure safety, aestheticsand performance while saving energy.

3.      Systems can also provideinfrastructure management functions, such as identifying non-functioningluminaires.  Can also provide energyconsumption data.

4.      The 2-way reporting of failed lampsis probably more valuable for saving time and money locating and repairingfailed units.

Depending on what additional features are included there could be more benefitsfor police being able to control lighting in crimes scenes, occupancy sensorresponse could alert security staff to activity, integrated security systems,designation of evacuation routes, attracting customers to special events,load-shedding management, car lot sales could adjust for after hours occupants,

5.      Not too many but some (maintenancerelated, etc)

6.      Could be some safety benefits whenlights respond to occupancy/movement

How ready are product and provider to scale up for widespread use in the Pacific Northwest?
Technology Readiness Score: 2.7
Comments:

1.      For limited area controls, such as aparking garage, parking lot, or area lighting, there are many systems availablefor lighting controls based on available light, occupancy, and schedules. Forlarger areas, there are generally limitations in occupancy sensor rangecompared to lighting area covered. Street and roadway lighting is a verydifferent application for dynamic lighting controls. This will requireadditional information from IES, NHTSA and others to ensure roadway safety.

2.      Various products are Very Good.  But end users really need to understand thetechnology and what they want out of it. Know the difference between good performing products and vendor hype.  Expectations can only be met if the rightproduct for the application is selected.

3.      Systems have been implemented insmaller scale applications, but are not in widespread use.

4.      Equipment is available, how manyinstallers are trained and compatible systems available for an existing system Idon't know, many products are proprietary.

5.      I am not super familiar with thespecific offerings in this area.  I dobelieve there are some but this it definitely somewhat "cutting-edge"and products still need to be "proven" in some areas (how reliableare wireless signals; can outdoor occ sensors in parking lots reliable sensorin poor weather, etc)

6.      A number of good systems alreadyavailable

How easy is it to change to the proposed technology?
Ease of Adoption Score: 2.5
Comments:

1.      For limited area controls, such as aparking garage, parking lot, or area lighting, the ease of adoption is good.The ease of adoption in large, roadway and street lighting is more difficult.

2.      Adopting these systems has becomemuch easier as more players enter the field, but the costs of installing newfixtures and systems made be problematic.

3.      Depends on what compatible equipmentis available and if experienced installer and commissioner is available.

4.      Fairly easy retrofit but may haveissues listed above

5.      Generally, deployment necessitatesnew fixture installation.

Considering all costs and all benefits, how good a purchase is this technology for the owner?
Value Score: 2.8
Comments:

1.      Prices for exterior LED products aredecreasing. Depending on the application and usage patterns of the customer,this is generally a good buy. This is especially true for parking garages,where the lights are on 24x7.

2.      Currently prices are anywhere from$150 to $250 per unit.  Prices have tocome way done.  Once this is in the $50range adoption will be more widely spread.

3.      If doing lighting and controls atthe same time or controls only first. Controls after a lighting upgrade may notbe cost effective

4.      As the cost of replacement fixturesand systems comes down in price, the value of these systems will rise. In newconstruction, these system should be implemented where ever possible.

5.      Installation expense can be abarrier if only energy savings are considered. Including non-energy benefits can improve the economics.

6.      The self-reporting of problems seemsto be more important than the energy savings to many. Energy savings could besubstantial in appropriate locations.

7.      Application specific bysavings/value can be good.



Completed:
5/15/2013 4:32:03 PM
Last Edited:
5/15/2013 4:32:03 PM

2009 Lighting TAG (#1)


Technical Advisory Group: 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo