WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

Desiccant Dehumidifiers for Grocery & Cold Storage

Cold Storage: Desiccant dehumidifier vs. Conventional

A solid desiccant dehumidifier integrated with the HVAC system that can maintain the humidity level inside a building in the range of 30% to 40%.

Synopsis:

The technology has been available for more than 10 years, but has not yet been widely adopted.  A solid desiccant dehumidifier is integrated with the HVAC system to maintain the humidity level inside a building at approximately 30% to 40%.  For grocery stores, this saves energy because reheaters are not needed on glass cooler doors and the frequency of defrost cycles is reduced.  It may also reduce the energy needed for space cooling compared to conventional AC.  For grocery and cold storage, desiccant dehumidifiers can reduce corrosive damage from frost buildup on chilling equipment.  

The wet desiccant material is typically dried (“recharged”) using natural gas, although waste heat from chillers or solar heat are other options to recharge the desiccant.  While electricity use and overall energy use are both reduced with this technology, it might be considered a type of fuel switching unless waste or solar heat is used to recharge the desiccant.  

This technology is commonly applied to large industrial processes, although it is migrating to smaller commercial applications.  This is most cost-effective in hot, humid climates, and is not yet proven for use in the marine or dry climates of the Pacific Northwest.  It is probably most cost-effective for new construction, where the ductwork and other AC components can be downsized, versus renovation or retrofits, where the ducts have already been installed.

Energy Savings: 25%
Energy Savings Rating: Comprehensive Analysis  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.

Status:

Details

Desiccant Dehumidifiers for Grocery & Cold Storage

Cold Storage: Desiccant dehumidifier vs. Conventional

A solid desiccant dehumidifier integrated with the HVAC system that can maintain the humidity level inside a building in the range of 30% to 40%.
Item ID: 313
Sector: Commercial
Energy System: HVAC--Other HVAC Systems
Technical Advisory Group: 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)

Synopsis:

The technology has been available for more than 10 years, but has not yet been widely adopted.  A solid desiccant dehumidifier is integrated with the HVAC system to maintain the humidity level inside a building at approximately 30% to 40%.  For grocery stores, this saves energy because reheaters are not needed on glass cooler doors and the frequency of defrost cycles is reduced.  It may also reduce the energy needed for space cooling compared to conventional AC.  For grocery and cold storage, desiccant dehumidifiers can reduce corrosive damage from frost buildup on chilling equipment.  

The wet desiccant material is typically dried (“recharged”) using natural gas, although waste heat from chillers or solar heat are other options to recharge the desiccant.  While electricity use and overall energy use are both reduced with this technology, it might be considered a type of fuel switching unless waste or solar heat is used to recharge the desiccant.  

This technology is commonly applied to large industrial processes, although it is migrating to smaller commercial applications.  This is most cost-effective in hot, humid climates, and is not yet proven for use in the marine or dry climates of the Pacific Northwest.  It is probably most cost-effective for new construction, where the ductwork and other AC components can be downsized, versus renovation or retrofits, where the ducts have already been installed.

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: Supermarket dehumidification with refrigerant
Baseline Energy Use: 12.3 kWh per year per square foot

Comments:

The typical EUI for a supermarket, as found from ( ASHRAE, 2009-10-01) uses 179 kBTU/sf/yr (52.4 kWh/sf-year equivalent).  For the "Grocery" sector in the Northwest, NEEA's 2009 Commercial Building Stock Assessment identifies an electrical EUI of 44.7 kWh/sf-year for electrically heated and cooled buildings (see Table D-EA5).  Buildings with no electrical heating or cooling have an electrical EUI of 32.4 kWh/sf-year, implying that heating and cooling for grocery stores accounts for about 12.3 kWh/sf-year.  Lighting and refrigeration accounts for much of the remainder of the electrical loads.   

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims: Currently no data available.
Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 25%
Low and High Energy Savings: 20% to 30%
Energy Savings Reliability: 5 - Comprehensive Analysis

Comments:

(Fricke, Sharma, 2011) The use of hybrid HVAC systems that incorporate desiccant dehumidification have been proposed for supermarket applications (GRI 1984) (Mitchell, et al. 1992) (Capozzoli, et al. 2006) (Lazzarin and Castellotti 2007).

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
9.2 kWh per square foot per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Technical Potential:
Units: square foot
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 84,600,000
Comments:

The Food Marketing Institute (in their Industry Overview 2013, Supermarket Facts sheet) indicates that there are 37,459 supermarkets in the U.S. with annual sales of $2 million or more.  Prorating by population indicates that there may be 4% x 37,459 or 1,498 large supermarkets in the Northwest. The 2009 "Northwest Commercial Building Stock Assessment" lists "Grocery" stores as comprising 84.6 million sf of floor area (Table C-GB1).  To obtain the desired savings, the dehumidifier might have to be installed in conjunction with other control or technologies such as Refrigeration System Controllers (ET #4) or Freezer Anti-Sweat Heater Controllers (ET #24).

Regional Technical Potential:
0.26 TWh per year
30 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost: Currently no data available.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): N/A

Simple payback, retrofit (years): N/A

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Reference and Citations:

Fricke, Sharma, 08/12/2011. Isolated Sub-Dehumidification Strategies in Supermarkets
ORNL

Munters, 01/01/2013. Case studies
Munters

Rank & Scores

Desiccant Dehumidifiers for Grocery & Cold Storage

2010 HVAC TAG (#3)


Technical Advisory Group: 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo